RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02469
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect the Air Reserve Forces
Meritorious Service Medal (ARFMSM).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He served during the period of eligibility and should be
entitled to award of the ARFMSM.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal
statement and memorandum.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 13 Mar 53, the, applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserves
(AFR).
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPTS recommends denial. A review of the applicants
military personnel records and the documentation provide failed
to substantiate the applicants entitlement to award of the
AFRMSM.
The AFRMSM was established 7 Apr 64, effective on or after 1 Apr
65, based on four continuous years of service or on or after
1 Jul 75, based on three year continuous years of service, to
recognize exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in an
enlisted status in the Air National Guard and AFR.
The applicants service in the AFR was prior to the effective
date with the exception of four months served after the
effective date until he was discharged.
The complete DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 29 Sep 14, for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-02469 in Executive Session on 12 Mar 15, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-02469 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Jun 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPTS, dated 16 Sep 24, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Sep 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01198
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends approval indicating the applicants medical circumstances and units decision to discontinue the applicants participation prevented her from earning sufficient participation points to complete a qualifying year of service for RYE 11 Mar 14. Until the contested year, the applicant had a spotless participation history, achieving 14 satisfactory service years through RYE 11 Mar 13. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00917
The applicants master personnel records reflect a DD Form 214, was issued for the period 22 Apr 91 and 10 Sep 91. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05880
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPTS recommends denial. The Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) conducted a review of the applicants National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) records and there are no documents that identify the applicants participation on active duty during December 1971. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02620
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02620 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty and NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be corrected to reflect award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). Per AFI 36-2803, The Air Force Military Awards and...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03159
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial of award of the AFEM and JMUA, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The JMUA is only awarded to those members of the Armed Forces of the United States who were present at the time and directly participated in the service or...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02469
In support of her request the applicant provides copies of her DD Form 2656, Data for Payment of Retired Personnel; ARPC Form 83, Application for Retired Pay; DFAS CL 7220/148, Retiree Account Statement; Reserve Order EL-2550 and ARPC/DPTTR memorandum dated 11 Apr 2013. On 7 Jul 2012, she declined coverage under the SBP, and her spouse concurred in her decision. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Jul 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02187
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02187 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, with a period of service ending 30 Sep 05, be corrected to include active duty time served from 21 Sep 90 to 3 Jul 91. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00473
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00473 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his service was active duty support work, rather than active duty for training...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02511
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02511 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation date be changed to August 2006 and her grade to be corrected to airman first class (E-3). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02382
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS indicates DAFSCs are based on a members position, not experience level in accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, paragraph 1.4.8 (Atch 1). ARPC further recommends that the applicant submit her request, along with the appropriate documentation to the...